So, I recently started into The Once and Future King. I'm probably on chapter 6 or something. Anyway, I'm enjoying the blatant anachronisms. Somewhere early on, probably the first page, the author explains that all that was just said between two characters was anachronistic. That is, the meaning was kept but the details were changed to make the story more readable. Well, that's an odd thing to bring attention to, or so it seems to me: it doesn't really hurt the pacing, but it doesn't need to be said; so, why say it?
Well, pretty soon we meet Merlyn, the walking anachronism. The writer seems to delight in having Merlyn mention or be associated with things in the author's present, the story's future. And he has a very interesting explanation for this: Merlyn perceives time backwards to everybody else. He cries when young Art tells him they just met because it means, for Merlyn, that this is their last meeting.
So, the author is drawing our attention, again and again, to the anachronisms, but why? Well, it seems to me to go both ways: He may be writing about the past and putting the present into it, but he's also writing about the present and placing it in the past.
Why is he doing this? I don't know, but it's fun.
- What are your thoughts on Anachronism?
- Have you ever read The Once and Future King? (and what do you think?)
- What are some of your favorite parts of Athorian legend?